Material and techniques

To investigate stereotypes off subgroups of females and you may people, we basic used an excellent airplane pilot investigation to attain a list of contemporary gender subgroups into the Norwegian society.

Airplane pilot Analysis

Participants (N = 60) was basically contacted publicly in the city heart away from Bergen, Norway, and you may asked to take part in an initial survey regarding and this groups it feel that ladies and people in neighborhood are split directly into. Among the many users, fifty.0% was in fact women. A great 48.3% was basically boys (that fellow member don’t answer fully the question throughout the intercourse/gender 2 ) as well as the indicate many years are (SD = , variety 18–79). The vast majority of (90.0%) did not have an immigrant records. The rest got often immigrated by themselves (six.7%) otherwise was basically Norwegian born to 1 or one or two immigrant parents (step one.7%). You to definitely new member don’t respond to the background question.

Brand new knowledge for the professionals was due to the fact: ‘There are many different “types” of females in today’s people. Please write down as much different types of ladies (elizabeth.grams., mothers of young children, businesswomen) as you are able to consider.’ Other web page try left blank towards fellow member to enter with the. On another page, a comparable knowledge talking about particular men was showed. Your order of speech are counterbalanced so as that half the participants listed lady very first, others half of noted males earliest.

Normally, the participants noted eight.28 different kinds of girls (SD = 4.07, assortment 0–21) and you may eight.42 different kinds of people (SD = cuatro.47, range 0–24). About three standards was in fact utilized to decide which communities might be chosen since stimulus teams in the main study: (a) the team must be mentioned by the about five participants, (b) i tried to possess organizations off more social positions and you can categories (e.grams., groups outlined by the family and you will professional opportunities and intimate orientations), and (c) i wished to guarantee that we had parallel male and female subgroups (e.grams., men political leaders and you may lady politicians, single parents, and you will unmarried dads) in order to facilitate reviews of individuals consuming a comparable societal role and you can classification. The possibilities you to an organizations will likely be stated by four participants are informed of the earlier published works (age.g., Lee and you will Fiske, 2006; Dentro de ainsi que al., 2013) but was also pragmatic in the sense that a more strict criterion carry out reduce amount of communities integrated and you can an even more lenient you might encompass a lot of organizations become ranked.

Centered on these types of conditions, 19 male subgroups (providers people, fathers away from young children, police- and you will firemen, bachelors, steeped men, performs males, delicate men, male college students, outdoorsy males, solitary dads, helpful boys, solitary people, male frontrunners, old guys, homosexual boys, male academics, sporty males, male politicians, and you can rockers) and you can twenty two subgroups of females (solitary moms and dads, people political leaders, job people, parents from young children, nurses, feminists, people college students, outdoorsy ladies, coaches (the feminine kind of the term inside the Norwegian was used), lesbians, dated girls, blog writers, unmarried girls, immigrant people, manly female, women, women writers and singers, do so females, ladies academics, manner female, housewives, and people leadership) was basically chosen.

Choosing organizations simply based on the salience in the airplane pilot test isn’t instead of dangers. As Fiske ainsi que al. (2002) discussed, both organizations eliciting aversion plus in-organizations could be less likely to come. I understand that all of our list of communities is restricted in many ways: For example, the list does not include the full selection of sexual orientations (e.g., bisexual men or women was excluded, heterosexuality was not mentioned on pilot and you may allegedly drawn to possess granted), and you will “immigrants” were utilized in the place of indicating particular ethnicities or places out of supply. We’re not indicating that our record is actually user of subgroups that ladies and you can males may end up in. Although not, this new communities chosen was outstanding on the Norwegian perspective, and several of your integrated sex subgroups were identified during the previous lookup in other national contexts (Athenstaedt et al., 2008).