Table ten:Setting and you will Important Deviations of your own Polyamorous Try Centered on Most recent Dating Sorts of and you can Level of comfort with Revelation so you can Mental health Positives.
As can rise above the crowd from inside the Table eleven, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous some body already in the low-the full time nonmonogamous dating advertised lower full matchmaking pleasure (just like the counted by GMREL overall measure get) than simply polyamorous someone within the monogamous relationship (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous relationship (p=0.00), nonhierarchical non-monogamous relationship (p=0.00), moving relationship (p=0.00), triad dating (p=0.00), polyfidelity matchmaking (p=0.00), polyfamily dating (p=0.00), tribe/ pod matchmaking (p=0.00), “other” matchmaking (p=0.00), and you will polyamorous people that stated that these were “undecided” about their current relationships kind of (p=0.00).
Difference in current relationships variety of and you may sexual pleasure because the mentioned by this new GMSEX
47; F(11,6018)=, p=0.00). Follow-upwards univariate ANOVAs discovered that there clearly was an improvement between current dating type towards the every size of the fresh GMSEX: Dimensions step 1 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Dimensions 2 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Measurement step 3 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Dimension cuatro (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect 5 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), therefore the overall measure get migliori siti per incontri lgbt single, overall relationship fulfillment (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00). To recognize and this relationship products differed where almost every other dating designs, pairwise reviews had been presented (Tukey HSD).
As well as rise above the crowd into the Dining table twelve, pairwise reviews found that polyamorous some body already from inside the low-the amount of time nonmonogamous matchmaking stated that the latest intimate matchmaking were quicker fulfilling (because the measured by Aspect step 1 to the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous somebody inside the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting unearthed that polyamorous anybody currently within the monogamous dating stated the most recent relationships had been reduced rewarding (due to the fact measured from the Dimensions step 1 towards GMSEX) than simply polyamorous people inside moving (p=0.05) and you may polyfamily relationship(p=0.04). Pairwise reviews learned that polyamorous some one already inside “other” known relationship said the intimate dating had been smaller fulfilling (since measured because of the Aspect step 1 for the GMSEX) than polyamorous anyone from inside the low-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.03), moving (p=0.01), and you can polyfamily relationship (p=0.01). Simultaneously, pairwise evaluations learned that polyamorous people that identified as “undecided” about their newest relationship sorts of stated that the intimate relationships had been faster satisfying (because measured because of the Aspect step 1 toward GMSEX) than just polyamorous someone when you look at the swinging relationship (p=0.05).
As can rise above the crowd within the Table 13, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous somebody for the non-the time low-monogamous matchmaking reported that its current sexual relationship was reduced rewarding (due to the fact counted by the Aspect 2 on GMSEX) than simply polyamorous anyone inside the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you can polyfamily relationship (p=0.00). Pairwise reviews learned that polyamorous people currently from inside the monogamous relationships reported its sexual dating have been quicker rewarding (once the mentioned by Dimensions 2 towards the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous individuals in non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.04) and polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.03). On the other hand, pairwise contrasting discovered that polyamorous people that identified as “undecided” inside their newest matchmaking style of reported that the intimate relationship was in fact less satisfying (once the mentioned of the Dimension 2 towards GMSEX) than simply polyamorous people into the swinging (p=0.05) and you may polyfamily relationships (p=0.02).
Multivariate evaluating was indeed presented and discovered there was a serious difference in current relationship models to the an effective linear blend of dimensions of sexual joy and you can total sexual pleasure as counted by GMSEX (Wilks’ Lambda=0
As can get noticed into the Dining table 14, pairwise evaluations unearthed that polyamorous someone into the low-the time non-monogamous relationships stated that their current sexual relationships was in fact quicker satisfying (just like the mentioned because of the Measurement step 3 to the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous individuals within the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you can polyfamily relationship (p=0.00). Pairwise evaluations found that polyamorous some body in the monogamous matchmaking stated that their most recent sexual relationships was indeed faster satisfying (since the counted of the Aspect 3 into GMSEX) than just polyamorous somebody within the polyfamily relationship (p=0.02). At the same time, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous somebody inside polyfamily relationships reported that its newest sexual relationship had been as pleasing (because mentioned of the Dimensions step 3 towards GMSEX) than polyamorous individuals in the “other” relationship (p=0.02) and you may polyamorous those who recognized as “undecided” inside their current matchmaking particular (p=0.01).
Нет Ответов